Official department of education/department of communications policy is for more computers into primary and secondary schools: Minister Ryan has pledged a chunk of extra money for such a purpose. What a waste of money. Kids don't need computers in schools -- most already have them at home already. And even if they don't, how can computers in schools help educate a child? Maybe CAD skills or technical studies for junior cert or transition year are worth it. But for younger kids? Go back to the basics: reading, writing, language skills, maths. Leave the computing skills until they get sad and lonely later on in life.
As an unofficial technical support person to my sister in her role as primary school head over 10-15 years, I'd have to agree, schools don't need more student PCs; what they need is more interactive boards, (and laptops for every teacher as a 2nd priority and then a micro-laptop per child (cheap like India's proposed R400/$10 school laptop!) a distant 3rd).
Once you've seen an interactive board in use in a classroom you'd be convinced; pupils love them, teachers love them, they're effective teaching aids and they're getting cheaper everyday.
Tom
Posted by: Tom Gleeson | July 30, 2008 at 01:18 PM
What's the principle behind them? How do they help kids?
Posted by: Adrian | July 30, 2008 at 01:57 PM